Friday, September 05, 2008
QUICK PATS PREVIEW
What, Me Worry?
I think the trauma of Super Bowl XLII is wreaking havoc on Patriot fans. I heard one call WEEI yesterday and claim that Stephen Gostkowski "cost them some games" last year. Beyond the idiocy of the opinion was the fact that he used the plural 'games' when the Patriots lost just ONE game.
Let's face it, the Patriots don't have that mystique about them anymore. Back in 2001, 2003, and 2004, they would take on anyone, often as an underdog or slim favorite, and win. They were invincible in the playoffs.
But the last three seasons they've been very beatable. They've found ways to lose in the postseason instead of vice versa. In January 2007, they blew a 21-6 half-time lead in Indy, allowing 22 second half points. Brady's two picks against Denver abruptly ended the 2005 season.
This is why I'm not worried about Brady's foot, or any of the other regular season malarkey or hype. The regular season seems pedestrian now, at least to me. If Brady plays in 13 or more games, is there any doubt that the Pats will make the playoffs?
The AFC East is still a relatively weak division. Buffalo and Miami have improved a bit, but remain mediocre at best. The Jets acquired Favre, but the mainstream media have conveniently forgotten how much he sucked in 2005 and 2006. Dallas is the sexy pick to win it all, but Tony Romo hasn't won a big game in his life, and Wade Phillips is a shell of a coach. San Diego and Indianapolis will be good, but still beatable, just like last year.
I'm not saying the Patriots will walk to a divisional title. No NFL team, not even Miami, is a total pushover. But I'm not going to get excited or worried until January. That's when the Patriots separated themselves from the rest of the League in '01, '03' and '04. And that's when they've collapsed in '05, '06, and '07.
So even if Brady doesn't play and/or the Chiefs win on Sunday, it still won't be panic time.
Season prediction: 14-2, AFC East Champions, then God only knows in the postseason.
Week 1 prediction: New England 31, Kansas City 13.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pats didn't collapse in 2005....they were not that good.
ReplyDeleteIn 2006 they lost to a better Colts team with a defense that had signed guys off the street that same week and who had been in a war with a much better San Diego team the week before.
The 2007 season had more than a few games where the Pats had to pull the game out of their ass and rely upon other teams' mistakes. They lost the SB on a circus catch play which happens some times. In 2006 vs SD if Troy Brown doesn't stip the ball when defending after an INT they go home.
That's why they play the games....
They lost to a better Colts team in 2006, but they beat a supposedly better Colts team in 2003 and 2004. They also dominated a better Colts team in '06 for 30 minutes. But down the stretch they didn't make the big plays. Same goes for the game against the Giants, no big plays to stop New York's final scoring drive, even though they had opportunities to make big plays.
ReplyDelete